Do mRNA vaccines include self-assembling nanostructures? Documenting such structures in mRNA vaccines, a recent peer-reviewed longitudinal study raises significant concerns over their composition, safety, and toxic impact. Young Mi Lee and Daniel Broudy’s study, titled “Real-Time Self-Assembly of Stereomicroscopically Visible Artificial Constructions in Incubated Specimens of mRNA Products Mainly from Pfizer and Moderna: A Comprehensive Longitudinal Study,” examines and documents  the self-assembling nanostructures in some of these vaccines.

This discovery is significant for many reasons, one of which is that neither Pfizer nor Moderna have publicly disclosed the presence of self-assembling nanostructures in their mRNA products.

This paper, published in the journal Injuries Causes and Treatments Part 2, documents real-time injuries at the cellular level. The researchers used a stereomicroscope to look at how nanostructures formed in mRNA vaccine samples that were grown in different media under controlled conditions. They examined the contents of COVID-19 vaccines under a stereomicroscope at up to 44x magnification. Carefully preserved specimens were cultured in a range of media to observe relationships between the vaccines and living cells under controlled conditions.

Key Findings and Implications

The study revealed several startling findings. The researchers discovered cellular toxicity from the mRNA products. They observed on the order of 3~4 x 106 per milliliter of the vaccine–visible artificial self-assembling nanostructures ranging from about 1 to 100 µm (or greater) of many different shapes. These included animated worm-like structures and other nanostructures of various shapes and sizes.

The study found that these structures represented incredibly high levels of contamination in the COVID-19 vaccines. Incubation studies revealed the “progressive self-assembly of many artificial structures”. Simple structures became more complex in shape and size over the course of two or three weeks, developing into stereoscopically visible “entities in three dimensions.” They resembled “carbon nanotube filaments, ribbons and tapes, some appearing as transparent, thin and flat membranes or three dimensional spirals or beaded chains.” The study reported some of these nanostructures would appear and disappear over time.

The researchers concluded that the structures they observed were some kind of undisclosed nanotechnology in the COVID-19 vaccines. Dr. Anthony Fauci’s testimony to the House Energy Committee in September of 2019, which included a statement that the mRNA vaccines would be “self-assembling nanoparticles,” aligns with this finding.

These observations raise serious concerns about the safety and efficacy of mRNA vaccines. The authors argue that the paper conclusively shows that the Covid vaccines are neither safe nor effective, contradicting the widespread claims made by vaccine manufacturers and public health officials.

Public Policies and Mandates

The study’s findings are particularly troubling in light of the aggressive push for widespread vaccination and the implementation of vaccine mandates. The public was frequently required to take these mRNA products, and those who refused often faced significant consequences. President Biden even referred to non-vaccinated individuals as “murderers,” underscoring the intense social and political pressure that surrounded the vaccination campaign.

Through OSHA, the Biden administration attempted to compel 80 million Americans to receive vaccinations, threatening their jobs if they refused. A lawsuit later challenged this move in court, preventing the administration from imposing the Covid vaccines on Americans through OSHA. This legal battle underscores the tension between public health measures and individual rights.

Similar controversies erupted in other countries. In Canada, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau seized the bank accounts and cryptocurrency accounts of truckers who refused to take the Covid vaccines and protested against mandates. The Australian government took even more extreme measures, putting many of their citizens who refused to take the Covid vaccines into “Covid camps.” These actions highlight the global nature of the vaccine debate and the authoritarian approaches taken by some governments.

Legal Immunity and Ethical Concerns

One of the most contentious aspects of the mRNA vaccine rollout has been the legal immunity granted to vaccine manufacturers. The Covid vaccine companies had legal immunity from any liability for vaccine injuries caused by their vaccines, while also deceptively marketing their vaccines as “100% Safe and Effective.” This arrangement presents a clear conflict of interest. Critics argue that this is a profound contradiction, questioning how a Covid vaccine company can publicly declare their products to be safe and effective after having obtained legal immunity under all governments from any liability should their claims prove false.

Laws like the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act in the United States granted this legal protection ostensibly with the intention of encouraging innovation and rapid vaccine development. However, it has also raised significant ethical concerns about accountability and the balance between public health objectives and profit motives. The question remains: if the Covid vaccines are as safe and effective as they claim, why obtain immunity from any legal liability?

mRNA products have also been linked to the appearance of strange white clots being discovered by morticians around the world.

In the final conclusion of the paper, the authors write:

“A review of government white papers and scholarly literature in biotechnology, nanotechnology, materials science, and electronics engineering combined with longitudinal incubation studies reveal compelling evidence of various fundamental corruptions.”