How Physicists Proved The Universe Isn’t Locally Real – Nobel Prize in Physics 2022 EXPLAINED

  • 0:00 The 2022 Physics Nobel Prize 
  • 0:51 Is the Universe Real?
  • 1:58 Einstein’s Problem with Quantum Mechanics
  • 5:09 The Hunt for Quantum Proof
  • 7:37 The First Successful Experiment
  • 11:06 So What?

Last year, Alain Aspect, John Clauser and Anton Zeilinger won the 2022 Nobel Prize for Physics in response to their experiments with entangled photons, which proved to be a breakthrough in quantum information science.

These three experiments produced results that were inconsistent with Bell’s Inequality, which limits observable interactions in classical systems. 

More than five decades ago, Clauser conducted an experiment with polarized pairs of photons, which showed that the photons were entangled, meaning that they influenced one another in ways that seemed to transcend space and time.

But because of the manner in which the study was designed, it remained inclusive. Thus, Aspect et al conducted an additional experiment ten years later that much more conclusively demonstrated a violation of Bell’s Inquality.

Ten years later, in 1982, Aspect and colleagues at the Université Paris-Sud in Orsay, France, improved on Clauser’s experiment by using a two-channel detection scheme. This avoided making assumptions about the photons that were detected. They also varied the orientation of the polarizing filters during their measurements. Again, they found that Bell’s inequality was violated.

Nearly two decades later, Zeilinger conducted the third experiment, which more conclusively than ever showed the reality of nonlocality, which is the phenomenon that occurs when scientists produce instantaneous effects over vast distances. And, of course, the implications of nonlocality point in the direction of the physical world of space and time being illusions of sorts. 

In other words, in the minds of many quantum physicists, the spacetime matrix we refer to as reality is not, in fact, fundamental to reality. Yes, it has apparent laws that produce real consequences when we unwittingly break those laws, but cutting-edge science suggests that this spacetime reality is not the deepest reality and does not accurately reflect the deeper, underlying substrate that holds this reality together.

Amplified Tachyon

Digital CBD

Digital C60

Elderberry Immunity

Slim Spurling: Rediscovering the Science of Subtle Energy

Slim Spurling was a man who lived with intention, purpose, and a knack for turning the seemingly impossible into reality. He wasn’t your average tinkerer or inventor. He was a maverick—a true pioneer who believed in the power of energy and its potential to heal not just individuals, but the planet itself. Let’s dive into the fascinating life of Slim Spurling, a man who spent his years exploring the interplay of art, science, and the mysteries of the universe.

Read More »
fMRI Technology as a Means of Detecting Bioenergy

fMRI Technology as a Means of Detecting Bioenergy

What if modern scientific instruments could validate the ancient wisdom traditions that spoke of life force energy—prana, chi, or bioenergy? While cultures have acknowledged these vital energies for centuries, conventional scientific investigation has yet to explore them. In a paradigm-shifting series of experiments, researcher Wagner Alegretti has done exactly that, using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to capture the invisible dance of bioenergy within and beyond the human brain.

Read More »
Prana: The Universal Life Force

Prana: The Universal Life Force

Prana is a fundamental concept in Indian philosophy, particularly within Hinduism and yogic traditions. People often translate it as “life force energy,” “vital principle,” or “breath of life.” This term encapsulates the idea of a subtle energy that permeates all aspects of existence, both in living beings and inanimate objects. The recognition of prana extends beyond mere existence; it signifies the dynamic interplay of energy that sustains life.

Read More »
Julia Mossbridge: Predicting the Unpredictable

Julia A. Mossbridge: Predicting the Unpredictable

Imagine if your body could react to events before they happen. It sounds like science fiction, but a growing body of research suggests this might be a reality. Welcome to the intriguing world of predictive anticipatory activity (PAA), where the line between present and future blurs in surprising ways.

Read More »
Scientific validation of the orgone accumulator.

Scientific Validation of the Orgone Accumulator

In the controversial landscape of energy medicine, few subjects have sparked as much intrigue and skepticism as Wilhelm Reich’s orgone energy theory. Through the meticulous research of Dr. James DeMeo, Ph.D., who was one of the world’s foremost authorities on the life and work of Wilhelm Reich, this once-dismissed field is experiencing a remarkable renaissance in scientific inquiry. As a doctoral student, he conducted the first graduate-level research of Wilhelm Reich’s contentious claims and body of work, laying the groundwork for decades of scientific investigation to follow.

Read More »
Do geophysical conditions influence psi phenomena?

Do Geophysical Conditions Influence Psi Phenomena?

In the fascinating intersection of neuroscience, geophysics, and consciousness studies, Dr. Michael Persinger’s research stands as a testament to the potential influence of Earth’s natural phenomena on human consciousness and psychic experiences. While many scientists still refuse to accept the growing body of scientific evidence for psi phenomena, a growing number of scientists and researchers are embracing psi as a reality. Persinger’s innovative approach to understanding psi phenomena through the lens of geophysical influences has opened new avenues for scientific inquiry into experiences often dismissed as purely subjective or imaginary.

Read More »

Love this content?
Share it with your friends.

Email
Facebook
Pinterest
Twitter
LinkedIn

Related Articles

Introducing SES Pulse™

Subscribe To Pulse™
The Official Newsletter
By Subtle Energy

2 thoughts on “How Physicists Proved The Universe Isn’t Locally Real – Nobel Prize in Physics 2022 EXPLAINED”

  1. Bo Robert Atkinson

    For the sake of focussed discussion, the copper investments suggestion sounds fitting, if in fact Tesla broke an agreement, and if all of that were fully shown. In any case, we still lack the explanation of how “limitless power” was to be generated at the tower.

    What else may have been broken, besides one contract term, might also figure in, such as mankind’s eligibility to receive the source of power, which might have been shut off, from outside our world. Mankind might be a bit pompous to think it deserved all that power for nothing, in terms of prioritizing peace and good will on earth, where mankind lagged behind in the way of developing consciousness, while instead developed perpetual wars.

    Does mankind deserve so much for nothing, and still want more to top that off?

    How was Tesla lead towards developing weaponry, and how can an ultimate weapon stop wars in itself?

    I can’t judge Tesla for any of that, as he lived so lightly on the earth, and he served all life well, and the pompous movers and shakers had everything to do with wars, and with discouraging consciousness development of mankind.

    1. Mankind didn’t develop perpetual wars. A small group of people in power who wanted to keep mankind in perpetual wars, fear, poverty and division developed wars. Mankind does not deserve to be punished or deprived for the sake of some people’s merciless abuse and exploitation of humanity.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Shopping Cart