- 0:00 The 2022 Physics Nobel Prize
- 0:51 Is the Universe Real?
- 1:58 Einstein’s Problem with Quantum Mechanics
- 5:09 The Hunt for Quantum Proof
- 7:37 The First Successful Experiment
- 11:06 So What?
Last year, Alain Aspect, John Clauser and Anton Zeilinger won the 2022 Nobel Prize for Physics in response to their experiments with entangled photons, which proved to be a breakthrough in quantum information science.
These three experiments produced results that were inconsistent with Bell’s Inequality, which limits observable interactions in classical systems.
More than five decades ago, Clauser conducted an experiment with polarized pairs of photons, which showed that the photons were entangled, meaning that they influenced one another in ways that seemed to transcend space and time.
But because of the manner in which the study was designed, it remained inclusive. Thus, Aspect et al conducted an additional experiment ten years later that much more conclusively demonstrated a violation of Bell’s Inquality.
Ten years later, in 1982, Aspect and colleagues at the Université Paris-Sud in Orsay, France, improved on Clauser’s experiment by using a two-channel detection scheme. This avoided making assumptions about the photons that were detected. They also varied the orientation of the polarizing filters during their measurements. Again, they found that Bell’s inequality was violated.
Nearly two decades later, Zeilinger conducted the third experiment, which more conclusively than ever showed the reality of nonlocality, which is the phenomenon that occurs when scientists produce instantaneous effects over vast distances. And, of course, the implications of nonlocality point in the direction of the physical world of space and time being illusions of sorts.
In other words, in the minds of many quantum physicists, the spacetime matrix we refer to as reality is not, in fact, fundamental to reality. Yes, it has apparent laws that produce real consequences when we unwittingly break those laws, but cutting-edge science suggests that this spacetime reality is not the deepest reality and does not accurately reflect the deeper, underlying substrate that holds this reality together.

Kozyrev’s Mirror: Spiritual Technology for Extrasensory Perception (ESP)
Brattarb, CC BY-SA 3.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0), via Wikimedia Commons Russian medical practitioner Alexander V. Trofimov embarked on his pioneering research on human consciousness in collaboration with

Unraveling the Mystery of Dark Matter: Is it Really Dark, or Just the Misunderstood Ether?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9KlgHcDG-2o A Substantive, Moving, Dynamic, Spiraling Cosmological Ether American physicist and astronomer Dayton Miller’s ether-drift experiments, conducted between 1906 and 1929, suggested the presence of

Beyond the Physical Body: Exploring the Role of the Etheric Body in Health and Healing
“It is one of the commonest of our mistakes to consider that the limit of our power of perception is also the limit of all

Douglas Harding and the Headless Way to Enlightenment
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4ZAIB1xjbZM “It took me no time at all to notice that this nothing, this hole where a head should have been was no ordinary vacancy,

Physicist Believes We Are Living in a Virtual Reality | Thomas Campbell
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nWWRFA8v6aE “The smaller your reality, the more convinced you are that you know everything.” — Thomas Campbell Soon after earning his doctoral degree in physics,

The Scientific Study of Life Force Energy | Roger Taylor
Sometime in the late 1930’s Austrian doctor and psychoanalyst Wilhelm Reich discovered an energy he referred to as “orgone energy,” which was much subtler than
1 thought on “How Physicists Proved The Universe Isn’t Locally Real – Nobel Prize in Physics 2022 EXPLAINED”
For the sake of focussed discussion, the copper investments suggestion sounds fitting, if in fact Tesla broke an agreement, and if all of that were fully shown. In any case, we still lack the explanation of how “limitless power” was to be generated at the tower.
What else may have been broken, besides one contract term, might also figure in, such as mankind’s eligibility to receive the source of power, which might have been shut off, from outside our world. Mankind might be a bit pompous to think it deserved all that power for nothing, in terms of prioritizing peace and good will on earth, where mankind lagged behind in the way of developing consciousness, while instead developed perpetual wars.
Does mankind deserve so much for nothing, and still want more to top that off?
How was Tesla lead towards developing weaponry, and how can an ultimate weapon stop wars in itself?
I can’t judge Tesla for any of that, as he lived so lightly on the earth, and he served all life well, and the pompous movers and shakers had everything to do with wars, and with discouraging consciousness development of mankind.