Last year, Alain Aspect, John Clauser and Anton Zeilinger won the 2022 Nobel Prize for Physics in response to their experiments with entangled photons, which proved to be a breakthrough in quantum information science.
These three experiments produced results that were inconsistent with Bell’s Inequality, which limits observable interactions in classical systems.
More than five decades ago, Clauser conducted an experiment with polarized pairs of photons, which showed that the photons were entangled, meaning that they influenced one another in ways that seemed to transcend space and time.
But because of the manner in which the study was designed, it remained inclusive. Thus, Aspect et al conducted an additional experiment ten years later that much more conclusively demonstrated a violation of Bell’s Inquality.
Ten years later, in 1982, Aspect and colleagues at the Université Paris-Sud in Orsay, France, improved on Clauser’s experiment by using a two-channel detection scheme. This avoided making assumptions about the photons that were detected. They also varied the orientation of the polarizing filters during their measurements. Again, they found that Bell’s inequality was violated.
Nearly two decades later, Zeilinger conducted the third experiment, which more conclusively than ever showed the reality of nonlocality, which is the phenomenon that occurs when scientists produce instantaneous effects over vast distances. And, of course, the implications of nonlocality point in the direction of the physical world of space and time being illusions of sorts.
In other words, in the minds of many quantum physicists, the spacetime matrix we refer to as reality is not, in fact, fundamental to reality. Yes, it has apparent laws that produce real consequences when we unwittingly break those laws, but cutting-edge science suggests that this spacetime reality is not the deepest reality and does not accurately reflect the deeper, underlying substrate that holds this reality together.
Discover the connection between fascia and acupuncture meridians. Learn about the biomechanical responses, somato-visceral reflexes, and the role of fascia in traditional Chinese medicine. Explore how modern research is redefining the mechanism of acupuncture.
“It is around a hundred years since the Baron Reichenbach made the discovery of radiations that he named O-D. These discoveries can be considered the
Explore the mystery of Mohenjo Daro’s destruction: ancient nuclear blast or natural disaster? Uncover archaeological evidence, Hindu legends, and fringe theories about this enigmatic Indus Valley city’s sudden demise.
Explore the revolutionary work of Georges Lakhovsky and his Multi-Wave Oscillator (MWO), a groundbreaking device designed to enhance cellular health through electromagnetic frequencies. Discover its historical significance, applications in alternative medicine, and ongoing influence in bioelectromagnetics.
Explore Sri Aurobindo’s revolutionary theory on the evolution of mind to supermind. Discover the stages of mental evolution, integral yoga, and the concept of truth-consciousness in this comprehensive guide to Aurobindo’s spiritual philosophy.
Explore Claude Swanson’s “The Synchronized Universe Model (SUM),” a groundbreaking work that bridges science and spirituality, presenting evidence for the paranormal and proposing a new scientific paradigm that incorporates consciousness and its influence on reality. Discover how this model challenges traditional physics and offers insights into phenomena like psychokinesis and global consciousness.
2 thoughts on “How Physicists Proved The Universe Isn’t Locally Real – Nobel Prize in Physics 2022 EXPLAINED”
For the sake of focussed discussion, the copper investments suggestion sounds fitting, if in fact Tesla broke an agreement, and if all of that were fully shown. In any case, we still lack the explanation of how “limitless power” was to be generated at the tower.
What else may have been broken, besides one contract term, might also figure in, such as mankind’s eligibility to receive the source of power, which might have been shut off, from outside our world. Mankind might be a bit pompous to think it deserved all that power for nothing, in terms of prioritizing peace and good will on earth, where mankind lagged behind in the way of developing consciousness, while instead developed perpetual wars.
Does mankind deserve so much for nothing, and still want more to top that off?
How was Tesla lead towards developing weaponry, and how can an ultimate weapon stop wars in itself?
I can’t judge Tesla for any of that, as he lived so lightly on the earth, and he served all life well, and the pompous movers and shakers had everything to do with wars, and with discouraging consciousness development of mankind.
Mankind didn’t develop perpetual wars. A small group of people in power who wanted to keep mankind in perpetual wars, fear, poverty and division developed wars. Mankind does not deserve to be punished or deprived for the sake of some people’s merciless abuse and exploitation of humanity.