How Physicists Proved The Universe Isn’t Locally Real – Nobel Prize in Physics 2022 EXPLAINED

  • 0:00 The 2022 Physics Nobel Prize 
  • 0:51 Is the Universe Real?
  • 1:58 Einstein’s Problem with Quantum Mechanics
  • 5:09 The Hunt for Quantum Proof
  • 7:37 The First Successful Experiment
  • 11:06 So What?

Last year, Alain Aspect, John Clauser and Anton Zeilinger won the 2022 Nobel Prize for Physics in response to their experiments with entangled photons, which proved to be a breakthrough in quantum information science.

These three experiments produced results that were inconsistent with Bell’s Inequality, which limits observable interactions in classical systems. 

More than five decades ago, Clauser conducted an experiment with polarized pairs of photons, which showed that the photons were entangled, meaning that they influenced one another in ways that seemed to transcend space and time.

But because of the manner in which the study was designed, it remained inclusive. Thus, Aspect et al conducted an additional experiment ten years later that much more conclusively demonstrated a violation of Bell’s Inquality.

Ten years later, in 1982, Aspect and colleagues at the Université Paris-Sud in Orsay, France, improved on Clauser’s experiment by using a two-channel detection scheme. This avoided making assumptions about the photons that were detected. They also varied the orientation of the polarizing filters during their measurements. Again, they found that Bell’s inequality was violated.

Nearly two decades later, Zeilinger conducted the third experiment, which more conclusively than ever showed the reality of nonlocality, which is the phenomenon that occurs when scientists produce instantaneous effects over vast distances. And, of course, the implications of nonlocality point in the direction of the physical world of space and time being illusions of sorts. 

In other words, in the minds of many quantum physicists, the spacetime matrix we refer to as reality is not, in fact, fundamental to reality. Yes, it has apparent laws that produce real consequences when we unwittingly break those laws, but cutting-edge science suggests that this spacetime reality is not the deepest reality and does not accurately reflect the deeper, underlying substrate that holds this reality together.

Subscribe to the Pulse Newsletter for the science of subtle energy and frequency!

(Click the image below to sign up!)

Click here to subscribe

“This is great information! Keep it coming, my mind is hungry for some Truth. And for me now, subtleties and the search for understanding of such is my focus. Not hard, cold, two dimensional, static societal beliefs. Thanks!”

~ Frank

Amplified Tachyon

Digital CBD

Digital C60

Elderberry Immunity

ORMUS: The Discovery of White Powder Gold

The word “alchemist” conjures images of a time long past; the earliest chemists, shuffling around in hooded robes, at work in their laboratory during a time before science and spirituality were separate from one another.

Read More »

Love this content?
Share it with your friends.

Email
Facebook
Pinterest
Twitter
LinkedIn

Related Articles

Introducing SES Pulse™

Subscribe To Pulse™
The Official Newsletter
By Subtle Energy

1 thought on “How Physicists Proved The Universe Isn’t Locally Real – Nobel Prize in Physics 2022 EXPLAINED”

  1. Bo Robert Atkinson

    For the sake of focussed discussion, the copper investments suggestion sounds fitting, if in fact Tesla broke an agreement, and if all of that were fully shown. In any case, we still lack the explanation of how “limitless power” was to be generated at the tower.

    What else may have been broken, besides one contract term, might also figure in, such as mankind’s eligibility to receive the source of power, which might have been shut off, from outside our world. Mankind might be a bit pompous to think it deserved all that power for nothing, in terms of prioritizing peace and good will on earth, where mankind lagged behind in the way of developing consciousness, while instead developed perpetual wars.

    Does mankind deserve so much for nothing, and still want more to top that off?

    How was Tesla lead towards developing weaponry, and how can an ultimate weapon stop wars in itself?

    I can’t judge Tesla for any of that, as he lived so lightly on the earth, and he served all life well, and the pompous movers and shakers had everything to do with wars, and with discouraging consciousness development of mankind.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Shopping Cart